High School Seniors’ Attitudes Toward Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage, 2020

This Family Profile is an update of :
FP-19-10

Family Profile No. 03, 2022
Author: Adrianne R. Brown

The share of couples who cohabit prior to marriage has increased over time. Among marriages that took place between 2015 and 2019, three quarters were preceded by cohabitation, up from only one-third in the mid-to-late 70s (FP-21-04). This shift in behavior has been accompanied by a shift in attitudes toward cohabitation. Using Monitoring the Future data, this profile examines change in high school seniors’ attitudes toward cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage from 1976 to 2020. This measure is based on agreement or disagreement (neutral responses are not shown) with the statement “It is usually a good idea for a couple to live together before getting married in order to find out whether they really get along.” This profile updates previous profiles on high school seniors’ attitudes toward cohabitation using the most recent available data (FP-19-10; FP-16-13), and is a companion profile to High School Seniors’ Expectations to Marry, 2020 (FP-22-04).

Attitudes Toward Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage Over Time

  • The share of high school seniors who agreed with the notion of cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage increased from four out of ten (40%) in 1976 to seven out of ten (69%) in 2020.
  • The share who disagreed with cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage decreased from 44% in 1976 to just 15% in 2020.

Figure 1. High School Seniors’ Attitudes Toward Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage, 1976-2020

graph showing Figure 1. High School Seniors’ Attitudes Toward Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage, 1976-2020
Source: NCFMR calculations of Monitoring the Future, 1976-2020

Attitudes Toward Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Parental Educational Attainment

  • The share of high school seniors who agreed with cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage increased across all four categories of parental educational attainment between 1976 and 2020.
  • In 1976, the share of those who agreed that cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage was a good idea was smallest among those whose parents had less than a high school diploma (37%). In both 2006 and 2020, the share who agreed with cohabitation was largest among this group (75% and 79%, respectively).
  • In 2020, those whose parents had some college education and those whose parents had completed college had the smallest shares who agreed with cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage (68% for both)

Figure 2. High School Seniors’ Agreement with Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Parental Educational Attainment

graph showing Figure 2. High School Seniors’ Agreement with Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Parental Educational
Source: NCFMR calculations of Monitoring the Future, 1976-2020

Attitudes Toward Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Gender

  • In 1976 and 2006, larger shares of men than women agreed with cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage. By 2020, a larger share of women than men agreed with this view.
  • In 1976, about half of men (48%) and one third of women (33%) agreed with cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage. In 2020, over two thirds of men and women agreed with cohabitation (68% among men and 70% among women).

Figure 3. High School Seniors’ Agreement with Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Gender, 1976, 2006, and 2020

graph showing Figure 3. High School Seniors’ Agreement with Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Gender, 1976, 2006, and 2020
Source: NCFMR calculations of Monitoring the Future, 1976-2020

Attitudes Toward Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Race/Ethnicity

  • In 2006, there was little variation by race/ethnicity in agreement with cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage. The share of Black students who agreed with this notion (66%) was slightly higher than the share of White and Hispanic students who agreed (63% and 62%, respectively).
  • By 2020, nearly three quarters (74%) of Hispanic students agreed with cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage compared to 69% of White students and 65% of Black students.

Figure 4. High School Seniors’ Agreement with Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Race/Ethnicity, 2006 and 2020*

graph showing Figure 4. High School Seniors’ Agreement with Cohabitation as a Testing Ground for Marriage by Race/Ethnicity, 2006 and 2020*
Source: NCFMR analyses of Monitoring the Future, 2006 & 2020

* Prior to 2005, the Monitoring the Future data only indicated whether the respondent identified as White or Non-White, therefore 1976 is not included in this figure/analysis.

Data Source:

Miech, R. A., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., and Patrick, M. E. (2021) Monitoring the Future: A continuing study of American youth (12th-Grade Survey), 2020 (ICPSR 38156.v1) [Data set]. National Addiction & HIV Data Archive Program. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38156.v1

References:

Manning, W. D. & Carlson, L. (2021). Trends in cohabitation prior to marriage. Family Profiles, FP-21-04. Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research. https://doi.org/10.25035/ncfmr/fp-21-04  

Suggested Citation:

Brown, A. R. (2022). High school seniors’ attitudes toward cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage, 2020. Family Profiles, FP-22-03. Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research. https://doi.org/10.25035/ncfmr/fp-22-03

orange-horizontal-line
Contact us

Contact us

This project is supported with assistance from Bowling Green State University. From 2007 to 2013, support was also provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s) and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policy of any agency of the state or federal government.

Updated: 02/25/2022 09:01AM