| Goal | Strategies & Action Steps | Measure/Metrics/Targets | Annual Time Frames |
Proposal Information, Questions, & Guidance Implement a comprehensive application process that includes clear application questions and guidance. |
- Issue a charter application information packet or request for proposals (RFP) that: a) states any sponsoring priorities established by the College of Education & Human Development at Bowling Green State University; b) articulates comprehensive application questions to elicit the information needed for rigorous evaluation of applicants’ plans and capacities; and c) provides clear guidance and requirements regarding application content and format, while explaining evaluation criteria.
- Welcome proposals from first-time charter applicants as well as existing school operators/replicators, while appropriately distinguishing between the two kinds of developers in proposal requirements and evaluation criteria.
- Encourage expansion and replication of charter schools that demonstrate success and capacity for growth.
- Welcome applications proposing diverse educational philosophies, approaches, and school models.
- Require applicants to demonstrate capacity to serve students with diverse needs, such as students with disabilities or learning exceptionalities and English learners.
- Broadly invite and solicit charter applications while publicizing its strategic visions and sponsoring priorities, without restricting or refusing to review applications that propose to fulfill other goals. (Advanced Strategy and Action Step)
|
- Posting on website of all materials for new transfer/replicator community school applications (Instructions, Timeline, Application, and Evaluation Rubric).
- Posting on website of all materials for new transfer/replicator community school applications (Instructions, Timeline, Application, and Evaluation Rubric).
- Proposal to sponsored school(s) to complete the replicator community school application.
- Maintenance and expansion of distinctive community school portfolio.
- Application materials require demonstration of capacity to serve students with diverse learning needs.
- Posting of all materials for new and transfer/replicator community school applications (Instructions, Timeline, Application, and Evaluation Rubric). Ensure updated strategic plan in posted on the BGSU website.
|
- February 28
- February 28
- As needed
- September 30
- September 30
- Timeline specifics for applications located on sponsor website- continually posted and updated as needed. Strategic Plan posted prior to Jan 1.
|
Fair, Transparent, Quality Focused Procedures Implement and follow fair, transparent procedures to establish and operate a quality community school. |
- Implement a charter application process that is open, well publicized, transparent, and is organized around clear, realistic timelines.
- Allow sufficient time for each stage of the application and school pre-opening process to be carried out with quality and integrity.
- Explain how each stage of the application process is conducted and evaluated.
- Communicate chartering opportunities, processes, approval criteria, and decisions clearly to the public.
- Inform applicants of their rights and responsibilities and promptly notify applicants of approval or denial, while explaining the factors that determined the decision.
- Utilize a multi-stage process in which applicants are provided information at each stage and are permitted to respond to that information during the process.
- View denied charter applications as an opportunity to provide reasons for denial, so that applicants can decide if they wish to revise their plans based on that information and resubmit in the future.
|
- Posting of all materials for new and transfer/replicator community school applications (Instructions, Timeline, Application and Evaluation Rubric).
- Allotment of at least a nine-month pre-opening planning stage for all application timelines.
- Posting of all materials for new and transfer/replicator community school applications (Instructions, Timeline, Application, and Evaluation Rubric).
- Posting of all materials for new and transfer/replicator community school applications (Instructions, Timeline, Application, and Evaluation Rubric).
- Notification to applicants of approval or denial that includes detailed reasons for the proposed action.
- Conduct stakeholder interviews to provide additional information
- Notification to applicants of approval or denial that includes detailed reasons for the proposed action.
|
- - 4. Timeline specifics for applications located on sponsor website-continually posted and updated as needed.
- - 7. September 30
|
Rigorous Approval Criteria Implement rigorous approval criteria |
- Require all applicants to present a clear and compelling mission, a quality educational program, a solid business plan, effective governance, and management structure systems, founding team members demonstrating diverse and necessary capabilities, and clear evidence of the applicant’s capacity to execute its plan successfully.
- For replications and expansions: (a) Establish distinct, rigorous, and transparent requirements and criteria for applicants who are existing school operators or replicators (b) Streamlines and expedites the process for replication and/or expansion; and (c) Thoroughly reviews the past performance of all schools the operator has previously operated.
- Establish distinct requirements and criteria for applicants proposing to contract with education service or management providers.
- Establish distinct requirements and criteria for applicants that propose to operate virtual or online community schools.
|
- All community school applications include comprehensive, prescriptive requirements and evaluation criteria.
- Transfer/replicator community school applications include comprehensive, prescriptive requirements and evaluation criteria.
- All community school applications include comprehensive, prescriptive requirements and evaluation criteria.
- All community school applications include comprehensive, prescriptive requirements and evaluation criteria.
|
- - 4. Timeline
specifics for applications located on sponsor website-continually posted and updated as needed. |
Rigorous Decision Making Grant approval only to applicants who demonstrate strong capacity to establish and operate a quality charter school. |
- Grant charters only to applicants that have demonstrated competence and capacity to succeed in all aspects of the school, consistent with the stated approval criteria.
- Rigorously evaluate each application through thorough review of the written proposal, a substantive in-person interview with each qualified applicant, and other due diligence to examine the applicant’s experience and capacity, conducted by knowledgeable and competent evaluators.
- Engage, for both written application reviews and applicant interviews, highly competent teams of internal and external evaluators with relevant educational, organizational (governance and management), financial, and legal expertise, as well as thorough understanding of the essential principles of community school autonomy and accountability.
- Provide orientation or training to application evaluators (including interviewers) to ensure consistent evaluation standards and practices, observance of essential protocols, and fair treatment of applicants.
- Ensure that the application review process and decision-making are free of conflicts of interest and require full disclosure of any potential or perceived conflicts of interest between reviewers or decision makers and applicants.
- Engage in continuous review of application processes and consider: Are the current processes resulting in charter schools that the community wants and needs? What must change if different outcomes are desired? (Advanced Strategy and Action Step)
|
- Adherence to all applications’ comprehensive, prescriptive requirements and evaluation criteria
- Adherence to application reviewer protocol and applicant interview protocol
- Appointment and participation of application review team members, both internal and external
- Execution of annual application review team member training
- Collection of completed conflict of interest statements from all application review team members, both internal and external
- Application process review through a continual improvement process
|
- - 3. Timeline specifics for applications located on sponsor website- continually posted and updated as needed.
- September 30
- September 30
- September 30
|