BGSU Home |  Academics | Athletics | Libraries | Technology |  News |  Campus Map | Events|
.... .

Current Students | Future Students | Faculty / Staff / Administration | Alumni / Guests | Site Map | Search

Bowling Green State University
FACTS ABOUT BGSU
NEWS RELEASES

ARCHIVED NEWS RELEASES
2001 Archives
2000 Archives
1999 Archives

THE OFFICE OF MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS

Hearings on Ohio's tax structure slated at BGSU

Federal funding for teen pregnancy program

Grant to boost BGSU neuroscience center's research and outreach

 

 

NATIONAL STUDY SHOWS PARENTAL NOTIFICATION AN EFFECTIVE DETERRENT TO UNDERAGE DRINKING

BOWLING GREEN, O.--In the ongoing national attempt to reduce drinking by underage students on college campuses, one thing has been shown to be effective: parental notification of students’ drinking offenses, even on the first offense.

A national study of the effects of the policy–the first of its kind–has been conducted by faculty at Bowling Green State University, widely known for its higher education administration and college student personnel programs.

A total of 189 judicial administrators participated in the study, which was conducted by Dr. Donald Gehring, chair of the higher education administration program, Dr. Carolyn Palmer, a professor in the college student personnel program, and a team of BGSU graduate students.

The findings are to be published in the Forum of the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.

The results show that more than half of the responding institutions report a "slight or significant reduction in the number of alcohol violations as a result of having a parental notification policy and that parents were very supportive."

Not only have the number of alcohol violations gone down, Gehring said, but also the number of total incidents, which include vandalism and other alcohol-related offenses.

The Family Education Rights and Privacy Act was amended by Congress in 1998 to allow all parents to be informed when their under-21-year-old children had committed an alcohol or drug offense. Before that, colleges and universities only had the right to notify parents whose children were financially dependent. The BGSU study shows that as of February 2000, 82 percent of the participating institutions either had a parental-notification policy or practice, or were seriously considering implementing one this fall (2000).

"It means we’re including parents in a partnership to help their children," Gehring said.

This partnership between parents and the University addresses the problem of alcohol consumption in two ways, he said. Rather than merely having the parents take punitive action such as withholding use of a car from their children, the consequences on campus tend to be developmentally appropriate, Gehring said. At BGSU, for example, alcohol offenders will most often be referred to the Wellness Connection at the Student Health Center for alcohol counseling or be required to participate in a specific program.

And the best way to get the information about University policy to students is through their peers, he said, and not through printed material or lectures from faculty or staff.

"A national study showed that less than 1 percent read printed information about alcohol and drugs that federal laws require institutions to provide. Peer education programs clearly work the best," he said, adding that athletic coaches also seem to have a high degree of influence over student-athletes.

Increased training of residence-hall advisers is an important tool to get the word out to students that their parents can and will be notified if they violate University alcohol policy, even if they are financially independent.

Other federally mandated programs have not been shown to be effective, Gehring said. The Campus Security Act enacted in 1990, for example, also requires institutions to publish information concerning drug and alcohol laws and the effects of those substances, but it has not been a deterrent to student drinking. The reason for the failure is perhaps, as the above-mentioned study showed, students by and large do not read printed materials, or, if they do read them, do not give them the same credence as information they receive from their peers.

Similarly, the 1989 Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Amendments of 1989, which again mandated that specific written information be provided to students, has been shown in two national studies to have no effect on student knowledge or behavior. One of those studies was conducted by Palmer and Gehring, along with V. Guthrie, a graduate student, in 1992. (Posted 11/14/00)

 

12/5/00