INTEGRITY 

 
This chapter describes the documents, policies, and procedures that govern the university's practices and that make those practices public.

EXPECTATIONS, RIGHTS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The University is committed to setting reasonable and fair expectations for all members of the university community as well as respecting the rights of all members. An important component of student, faculty, and staff rights is the availability of dispute resolution and grievance procedures.

As a university community, we take the communication and dissemination of all expectations, rights, and responsibilities as seriously as the actual existence of these principles. Our use of technology allows for the electronic communication of handbooks and documents accessible from a variety of links.

Student Expectations, Rights, and Responsibilities
The University enhances student success by clearly articulating and consistently enforcing the expectations, rights, and responsibilities of students. The Student Handbook [HS1] sets forth the policies, procedures, and expectations for student behavior both inside and outside of the classroom. All students, including those at BGSU Firelands, are accountable for the expectations outlined in these documents. Additionally, BGSU Firelands publishes a student handbook with policies and procedures that are pertinent and specific to that campus [HF3].

Code of Academic Conduct. The objectives of the Code of Academic Conduct are to communicate to all members of the university community the principle that cheating and plagiarism are destructive to the central purposes of the University and are universally disapproved. The Code states procedures to be used by students, faculty, academic deans, and the Academic Honesty Committee in cases of academic dishonesty. The Code of Academic Conduct defines terms and jurisdiction; specifies all procedures for reporting a case of dishonesty; specifies procedures for responding to an allegation of academic dishonesty; establishes penalties; and describes the appeal process.

Code of Student Conduct. The objectives of the Code of Student Conduct include

  • to respect students’ rights fully;
  • to create an expectation for acceptable behavior; and
  • to define a process to be used when a student fails to adhere to the expectations for behavior.

The Code of Student Conduct defines terms, jurisdiction, and proscribed conduct; specifies the process used when a student or student organization is accused of violating the Code of Student Conduct; describes the sanctions that can be imposed; and describes the appeal process.

Family Educational Right to Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). FERPA affords students certain rights with respect to their education records including the right to review their records, request amendment to their records, give consent to disclosure, and file a complaint should the University not comply with the requirements of FERPA. The Office of Registration and Records, the Office of Student Life, and other offices (with the assistance of the Office of Registration and Records) monitor all aspects of the creation of information that culminates in student academic or education records.

Rights and Responsibilities for Student Organizations. The Office of Campus Involvement, in the Division of Student Affairs, is committed to providing support and assistance to all registered student organizations [GI1]. A registered student organization is granted privileges that include the use of services, access to facilities, and eligibility for general fee allocation.

The university community affords student organizations certain rights and privileges, so they are accountable for their actions as organizations and for the actions of individual members of the organizations as specified by the Code of Student Conduct. Expectations and policies governing student organization registration requirements and processes appear in the 2002-2003 Student Handbook [HS1].

Rights and Responsibilities for Student Athletes. In addition to the expectations, rights, and responsibilities of the general student population, student athletes assume expectations, rights, and responsibilities established by the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the Mid-American Conference, the Central Collegiate Hockey Association, and by the University. The Student-athlete Handbook [HS3] outlines all of these expectations, rights, and responsibilities.

Faculty Expectations, Rights, and Responsibilities
The Academic Charter [AC1] (including the Faculty Handbook [HF1]) and the BGSU Firelands Policies and Procedures Handbook Supplement [HF2] set forth expectations, rights, and responsibilities of faculty. Primary among the rights of faculty is academic freedom, which the Academic Charter defines as “the full freedom of speech, freedom to teach, to learn, and to conduct inquiry in a spirit of openness necessary to the acceptance of criticism, the expression of differing opinions, and the pursuit of truth.”

The Faculty Handbook addresses issues of integrity, ethics, and research. The Academic Charter addresses issues of hiring, promotion, tenure, and termination. As outlined in the Academic Charter, faculty responsibilities include effective teaching, scholarly or creative work, and service to the University and the profession. Additionally, faculty have the authority to approve the awarding of degrees, establish the Faculty Senate, review the actions of the Senate, and participate in various aspects of university governance.

The faculty play a vital role in the administration of the University through a model of “shared governance.” The Academic Charter ensures that the faculty continue to serve in this vital role.

Administrative Staff Expectations, Rights, and Responsibilities
The Administrative Staff Handbook [HA1] sets forth expectations, rights, and responsibilities for administrative staff. The representative constituent group for administrative staff, Administrative Staff Council, addresses issues of personnel welfare for administrative staff and forwards recommendations to senior level administration for further review.

Classified Staff Expectations, Rights, and Responsibilities
The Classified Staff Handbook [HC1] sets forth expectations, rights, and responsibilities for classified staff. The representative constituent group for classified staff, Classified Staff Council, addresses issues of personnel welfare for classified staff and forwards recommendations to senior level administration for further review.

Dispute Resolution and Grievance Procedures
Dispute resolution and grievance procedures are inherent in the expectations, rights, and responsibilities of all university constituencies. Access to these procedures and evidence that these procedures are used speaks to the fairness and integrity of these processes. The following is a summary of the dispute resolution and grievance procedures currently in place for students, faculty, administrative staff, classified staff, and unionized classified staff.

Student Dispute Resolution and Grievance Procedures. Student academic dispute resolution and grievance procedures are published in the undergraduate catalog [CU1] and the graduate catalog [CG1]. Examples of these policies and procedures include appeals for waivers of substitutions of course requirements, grade appeals, academic standing, and academic forgiveness.

The Code of Academic Conduct and the Code of Student Conduct handle academic and non-academic student conduct disputes; appeal processes are available in both codes. Information regarding the frequency of use of the student discipline process from July 1995 through December 2001 is available in the Resource Room [JS1]. In addition, 122 complaints regarding Academic Honesty were filed and handled during calendar years 2000 and 2001.

Students can dispute or grieve other policies such as student records policies and student organization policies. Each of these policies has a specific section devoted to an appeal or dispute situation. The policies, including dispute and grievance procedures, are available in the Student Handbook [HS1]. There is no evidence of a grievance or a dispute regarding FERPA during 2000 and 2001.

Finally, dispute resolution and grievance procedures are available to student athletes. The Student-athlete Handbook [HS3] contains procedures available to athletes for dispute resolution as permitted by the University and the NCAA. Athletic Department files show one non-financial grievance filed by a student athlete during 2000 and one financial grievance filed in 2001.

Faculty Dispute Resolution and Grievance Procedures. University faculty grievance procedures encompass a broad range of disputes and complaints relating to faculty employment status. Faculty Senate constructs and revises these policies and the Faculty Personnel and Conciliation Committee (FPCC), a body of 18 faculty members elected by the Faculty Senate, implements them. FPCC makes appropriate recommendations to the President or the Provost in order to help resolve disputes concerning general grievance, revocation of tenure, financial exigency, unlawful discrimination, and all other issues associated with faculty employment status.

The independence of Faculty Senate as a governing body, coupled with the breadth of authority and corresponding responsibility granted to FPCC, assures that faculty grievance procedures are applied fairly and equitably. Multiple options for resolution protect further the rights of individuals within a context of academic and institutional integrity.

The grievant may appeal to 1) the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, 2) the Board of Inquiry (an appointed panel of three FPCC members), or 3) the Board of Appeal (an appointed panel of seven FPCC members). Some circumstances call for the President to be the final arbiter; in cases of tenure revocation, the Board of Trustees reviews the record and makes the decision.

During calendar years 2000 and 2001, a total of eight grievances were filed and handled by the FPCC. Full details on the structure and functions of the FPCC are found in the Academic Charter [AC1].

            Staff Dispute Resolution and Grievance Procedures. Administrative and classified staff and unionized classified staff members have opportunities for dispute resolution and grievance. The following policies are subject to dispute resolutions and grievance as outlined in the appropriate staff handbook or union agreement:

  • Administrative Staff: sexual harassment policy, racial and ethnic harassment policy, administrative compensation conciliation and appeals process, and the conciliation process for on-compensation complaints.

  • Classified Staff: discrimination complaint procedure, sexual harassment policy, racial and ethnic harassment policy, and grievance procedure.

  • Unionized Classified Staff: sexual harassment policy, racial and ethnic harassment policy, and the grievance procedure.

Administrative staff used the non-compensation complaint process once in 2000 and once in 2001. Classified staff used their grievance procedure three times each in 2000 and 2001. The unionized classified staff (International Union of Police Association) used their grievance procedure not at all in 2000 and once in 2001.

RELATIONSHIPS WITH EXTERNAL CONSTITUENCIES

The University is committed to conducting ethical, responsible, and enduring relationships with prospective students, institutions of higher education, other external constituencies, and the public. Our commitment to integrity is evident throughout the documents that articulate and guide these relationships and their related activities.

Communications and Publications
The University has high expectations for developing ethical relationships with its external publics as evidenced in its reliable, accurate, and diverse external publications and communications. The Office of Marketing and Communications has central responsibility for coordinating marketing and communications efforts, including the review of public information for accuracy and reliability. As the official liaison between the University and the news media, the office coordinates all public information activities designed to promote better understanding of and support for the University and its programs. Largely for the benefit of internal constituencies, the Student Union coordinates Campus Fact Line, a telephone information service (419-372-2445).

Prospective Students. The Office of Admissions communicates the university’s vision and mission statements, tradition, values-oriented culture, and expectations to prospective students in print documents and electronic formats. The major informational publication used in the recruitment of first-year students is known as the Guide for Prospective Freshmen and Application [AA2]. The Office of Admissions issues a separate publication for the recruitment of transfer students [AA3]. Similar documents have been designed for use by students interested in attending BGSU Firelands [AA4]. These documents, as well as the Undergraduate Catalog [CU1] and the Graduate Catalog [CG1], contain admissions policy information. The catalogs include clear descriptions of all university requirements, regulations, programs, courses, and other relevant information. These online publications receive careful review for accuracy and reliability by the university’s academic areas and the Office of Registration and Records before distribution to the public. Admissions information [AI2] is available online .

Efforts and initiatives to establish ethical and responsible relationships with prospective students include participation in various recruitment activities as shown in the Office of Admissions 2001 - 2002 Itinerary Report [AI1]. These activities include high school visitations, college fairs, and activities such as the biennial Preview Days and the annual Presidents’ Day Open House.

The University actively recruits transfer students who have attended two-year institutions or have made specific inquiry to the Office of Admissions. We follow accepted practices and specific procedures that provide for the seamless transfer of credit between Ohio institutions. Specifically, the University follows the guidelines documented in the Ohio Articulation and Transfer Policy [AT1] for transferring students to the University from other state institutions. Colleges have developed transfer guides that provide transferring students with information about specific courses that may be used to meet degree requirements within that college [CU1]. Additionally, the University participates in the online Course Applicability System developed by the Ohio Board of Regents, Miami University, and Arizona Board of Regents to enable prospective student transfers to determine how coursework they have taken elsewhere applies to the University’s degree programs [CA3].

            Courses Offered. Lists of courses and programs offered are fully described in the Undergraduate Catalog [CU1] and Graduate Catalog [CG1]. Updates and changes to the course offerings and course descriptions are supported by a comprehensive curriculum modification process [CM2]. The undergraduate course offerings are accessible through the online catalog, and are updated monthly. A similar resource is being developed for graduate courses. The list of courses offered in each semester is provided in the Schedule of Classes [SC1 and SC2], which is published on a semester by semester basis.

Academic Records. The Office of Registration and Records holds as one of its primary goals the accurate and confidential handling of student academic records, including production and distribution of official transcripts. In support of this goal, the Office has incorporated many steps and mechanisms for monitoring these steps into its daily activities to ensure that student records are handled in accordance with high record-keeping standards and in strict compliance with academic policy. Policies that guide the actions of the Office include those articulated in the Undergraduate Catalog [CU1], Graduate Catalog [CG1], the Academic Charter [AC1], and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA), as amended.

In exercising its responsibility for reporting information from student academic records to off-campus agencies and organizations, the Office of Registration and Records acts in strict compliance with FERPA. Primary among the bodies requiring and receiving information from the Office are the Ohio Board of Regents, the Ohio Student Loan Commission, the Veterans’ Administration, and the NCAA. Any information that is released off-campus without prior student approval is either to organizations that have a legal right to the information, such as those listed above, or after approval by University General Counsel.

Institutions of Higher Education
The University actively engages in collaborations with other institutions of higher education to optimize the use of institutional funds in offering students a wide range of educational opportunities. Policies and agreements specific to the relationship guide each relationship.

Transfer Articulation Agreements. A comprehensive list of articulation agreements [AA7] indicates relationships with other institutions, including Owens Community College, Cuyahoga Community College, Lorain County Community College, Terra Community College, and others. These agreements clarify not only the allocation of credit, but also the provision and support of resources and oversight mechanisms for monitoring the contractual arrangement.

Affiliation Agreements and Joint Programs. The University has established numerous affiliations, including departmentally-based relationships, through agreements with state and regional programs and institutions. For example, the Criminal Justice Program has established affiliation agreements with more than 400 agencies or sites since the inception of the Program in the mid-1970s. Approximately 40 to 50 students benefit from these affiliations each year. Copies of these agreements are available in the College of Health and Human Services, Department of Criminal Justice. Individual agreements are located in the Office of the Provost and in college offices as appropriate. A summary list of these agreements [AA5] is located in the Resource Room.

The University offers concurrent enrollment with two other local universities: the University of Toledo and the Medical College of Ohio at Toledo (MCO). For example, students earn credit for Nursing and Physical Therapy course work offered by Bowling Green State University, but with the instruction taking place at MCO.

A challenge revealed by the self-study process is the absence of a centralized system with written guidelines for tracking and monitoring the numerous affiliation agreements entered into by various colleges within the University. We anticipate that an outcome of the self-study will be the development of a centralized or coordinated process and guidelines.

Education Abroad and International Exchange Programs. The University is building a strong reputation as an effective leader in education abroad and international exchange opportunities. Continuing Education, International, and Summer Programs is responsible for developing collaborative relationships and maintaining agreements for all education abroad and international exchange programs. The document BGSU Exchange Agreements [CE2] lists the more than 40 exchange agreements entered into in recent years.

The University adheres to NAFSA: Association of International Educators’ Principles for Institutions [NA1], which provides the code of ethics and general guidelines for engaging in our education abroad and exchange programs. The University upholds and endorses NAFSA principles as a baseline or benchmark for the administration of its education abroad programs and the recruitment and admission of international students. Additionally, NAFSA standards guide our efforts to provide culturally sensitive and informed professionals in the area of international exchange.

The number of students continuing their studies in another country has increased steadily from 223 in 1998-1999 to 235 in 1999-2000 to 267 in 2000-2001 as shown in the document Education Abroad Statistics [EA2]. In our efforts to expand education abroad opportunities, the University has signed the Ohio Consortium Agreement for Pooled Access to Study Abroad Programs [CA1], a proposal approved by the presidents of Ohio public universities early in November 2001. The Ohio International Consortium, which represents the international education offices, will be responsible for implementing this program.

The self-study process found that coordination among the many international exchange programs offered on campus was loose. The programs in existence went through a variety of approval processes resulting in some inconsistency in existing agreements.

To address this concern, CEISP is developing guidelines and instructions for linkages with foreign academic institutions. Documents currently under development include Instructions for Building an Agreement of Cooperation [CE1], Bowling Green State University Exchange Program Guidelines [EP1], and Guidelines for Establishing New Education Abroad Programs [EA3]. The Academic International Programs Council will review and coordinate these programs from an academic perspective.

Other External Constituencies
The University has developed enduring, collaborative relationships with business and industry, the federal government, and other agencies for the cooperative sharing of resources and services to enhance the student educational experience. The following programs and exchanges serve as representative examples of cooperating and consortial relationships whose measure of success, in large part, is due to the integrity of their procedures.

The Cooperative Education and Internship Program (CEIP). CEIP supports the university’s vision through the establishment of partnerships with several hundred organizations for the purpose of providing optional, alternative learning environments for students. Staff members cultivate new relationships and enhance existing ones through their interactions at professional meetings and conferences, telemarketing initiatives, direct mail campaigns, faculty referrals, on-site visits, internship fairs, and direct contact by employers. The Employer Verification Form [CE4] articulates the agreement between the cooperating employer and the CEIP. The Summer 2000, Fall 2000, Spring 2001 Aggregate Report [CE3] shows that 1,002 students participated in cooperative or internship opportunities through CEIP during summer 2000 through spring 2001.

The Washington Center. The Washington Center, a nonprofit, independent educational organization operating out of Washington, D.C., offers for-credit internships and academic seminars to students of all majors. The university’s program coordinator is a member of the National Liaison Board of the Washington Center. Students enrolled in the program gain practical work experience in academically relevant, supervised work positions in public and nonprofit organizations throughout the Washington, D.C. area, as articulated in the Washington Center Student Handbook [HW1] and in the university’s affiliation agreement with the Washington Center [AA4].

The National Student Exchange (NSE). NSE is a consortium of more than 120 four-year colleges and universities in the United States and its territories, including the University, which have joined together for the purpose of exchanging students among the member institutions. NSE is a corporation established to assist member campuses in providing opportunities for their students to exchange for up to one calendar year at another member of the consortium. Exchanges are controlled by the consortium members through a board of directors, the National Student Exchange Council. The NSE mission statement and guiding policies and procedures appear in the National Student Exchange Handbook [HN1]. The university’s program coordinator interacts with other member campuses on behalf of incoming and outgoing students who wish to progress toward their degrees and develop a greater appreciation for the diversity of our country and its cultures.

The Ohio Library and Information Network (OhioLINK). OhioLINK, a cooperative venture of university libraries and the Ohio Board of Regents, is a consortium of Ohio’s college and university libraries and the State Library of Ohio. This statewide electronic library system serves more than 500,000 students, faculty, and staff at 79 institutions. In 1992, Bowling Green State University Libraries was one of the first six university libraries to install OhioLINK systems. Through this system, we have facilitated access to an average of 71,795 items annually during the last five years. The 13 member OhioLINK Governing Board oversees the program, including the approval of its strategic directions and financial expenditures.

The Northwest Ohio Regional Book Depository (NWORBD). The NWORBD is a cooperative venture of Bowling Green State University, the University of Toledo, and the Medical College of Ohio to share a compact, high-density storage facility located in Perrysburg, Ohio. Construction of the facility took place in 1996 as a result of a recommendation by the Ohio Board of Regents in 1987 to academic libraries for alleviating stack overcrowding of research materials. The NWORBD is one in a system of five State of Ohio library depositories. The document, Fundamental Principles Northwest Ohio Regional Book Depository Participants: Bowling Green State University, Medical College of Ohio, University of Toledo [NO1], articulates guidelines for ownership of materials, use of space, and administration of budget and operations. The NWORBD Procedures Manual [NO2] outlines procedures for sending materials to the facility and circulating materials from the facility. Additionally, the manual articulates policies, including the borrowing policies, photocopying policy, and patron reading room.

The Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET). The NWOET is an Ohio non-profit corporation governed by a 16-member Board of Directors elected annually by the executive heads of the member schools [NF6]. NWOET provides educational materials and services to educators and students in public and non-public school districts in 21 Northwest Ohio counties. More than 250 elementary and secondary teachers from member schools belong to curriculum committees that annually assist NWOET in making decisions on instructional television programming, media purchases, and Foundation services.

            The Bowling Green State University Foundation, Inc. The Foundation was founded by the University Trustees in 1956. It is a non-profit corporation governed by a 36-member board of directors, at least half of whom are alumni, and many of whom are business leaders with a strong background in finance. The Foundation has assets of over 54 million dollars in more than 1,100 fund accounts. The purpose of the corporation is to assist in developing the advancement of the University, to further improve and extend its properties, services, and activities; and to engage in scientific, literary, historical, and other activities [BF1].

            The Alumni Association. The Bowling Green State University Alumni Association, Inc, exists to maintain alumni connections to the University. Its programs and services support the personal and professional success of our alumni and promote alumni involvement with and support of the University. The BGSU Alumni Association is governed by a 25-member Board of Directors [AA9].

INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH

The Vice Provost for Research and the Office of Sponsored and Research Programs (SPAR) share the primary responsibility for implementation of policies that govern research, sponsored programs, and intellectual property. This structure allows information requests and responses to be streamlined and ensures the integrity of the policies and procedures. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Management Assessment, the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, and the NIH Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration all play a role in determining how research and sponsored programs are conducted at the University. SPAR monitors university practice for compliance to policies, which are described in the SPAR Handbook [HS2].

As part of the submission for external support, each faculty member submitting a grant proposal must complete the university’s internal routing process. This policy has been in place since the early 1970s and is considered the “best practice” among all institutions of higher education receiving external funding. Internal endorsement provides for university review; identification, authorization, and commitment of matching resources; and tracking of university activity. Further, it provides assurance of adherence to all applicable regulations: that appropriate assurances have been established (e.g., human subjects and animals, policies regarding age and sex discrimination, policies regarding research data access, responsible conduct of research, inclusion requirements, etc.); that budgets reflect allowable costs (e.g., regulations regarding salaries and minimum wage, university approved stipend levels for graduate students, travel restrictions, purchasing and acquisition regulations, etc.); and that chairs, deans, and the Vice Provost for Research have reviewed and approved the activity.

The university’s signed commitment provides a guarantee that assures the availability of resources from the University. Only the Office of Sponsored Programs and Research negotiates awards on behalf of the institution. The Vice Provost for Research, as the authorized representative, must sign all proposals and most awards, thus legally binding the University to the conditions of grants and contracts.

Conflict of Interest
The policies in place at the University regarding conflict of interest follow the guidelines provided by the federal government. A standard part of the endorsement process requires that faculty members submitting proposals to external funding sources complete and sign a form indicating they have read and understand the university’s policy on potential conflict of interest. For the years 1999-2002, no conflict of interest was identified for any university-endorsed proposal.

Misconduct
Per federal requirements, the University enforces policies to provide assurance of research integrity. The university policy is detailed and provides an adequate process. Even though SPAR assures that proposals to federal agencies reflect the University’s compliance with the federal mandate, the Vice Provost for Research is responsible for administering the process when an incident is reported. No incidents of misconduct in research were reported to the Vice Provost for Research in 1999-2000 or in 2000-2001.

Human Subjects and Animals
Human subjects and animal policies are enforced through the joint efforts of the Office of Compliance, the Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB), and the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee (IACUC). The Vice Provost for Research has oversight of these committees; SPAR refers all proposals containing research with human subjects to the HSRB and follows up to assure completion before the time of award.

In compliance with federal regulations we require mandatory training of all faculty, staff, and students who participate in research and sponsored programs of any kind that include the use of human subjects and/or animals. In 1999-2000, HSRB reviewed 293 proposals: 283 approved, 1 denied, and 9 withdrawn before final approval. In 2000-2001, HSRB reviewed 280 proposals: 265 approved, 3 denied, and 12 withdrawn before final approval.

All faculty members, staff, and students who are involved in research utilizing animals are required to submit research protocols to the IACUC. The Director of the Animal Facility and the Research Compliance Officer are responsible for the mandatory training of faculty and students. SPAR refers faculty members to the IACUC at the time of proposal submission and follows up to assure completion before the award is made. In 1999-2000, IACUC reviewed and approved 22 proposals, and in 2000-2001, reviewed and approved 33 and denied 1.

In cases of either human or animal non-compliance, the consequences can range from temporary suspension of project activities until the project is brought back into compliance to the termination of the project by the HSRB or IACUC and the prohibition of the use of the collected data by the researcher.

Intellectual Property
By Ohio law, any invention developed with the use of university resources belongs to the institution; faculty are required to disclose any relevant discovery to the University. The Patent Advisory Committee reviews such discoveries and makes a recommendation on whether or not a patent process should be initiated. Details on this procedure are in the Academic Charter [AC1]. Our policy is a generous one that provides a large benefit to the inventor. Currently there are three active patents, and three pending applications. No patents have been licensed.

The University also generously supports copyrights and licenses pertaining to copyrights. The Academic Charter outlines applicable policy and procedures. The Copyright Committee meets to review copyright issues with a scope beyond articles and publications.

Biohazards, Hazardous Waste, Radioactive Materials, etc.
Materials describing the university’s hazardous waste program are available online [EH1]. The Safety and Health Coordinator monitors this program by designating contact persons in departments that generate hazardous waste, conducting periodic inspections of these areas, and training laboratory personnel.

The Infectious Waste Program guides the university’s management and disposal of such materials and it is the responsibility of the Safety and Health Coordinator. The university’s Radiation Safety Manual guides the management of radioactive materials via the Radiation Safety Officer, who conducts quarterly inspections of laboratories that use radioactive materials; the Officer makes informal checks of these areas between the quarterly visits. The Radiation Safety Officer also approves, checks in, and delivers all orders of radioactive materials for the University. The Radiation Safety Officer oversees the use of radioactive materials on campus. The Environmental Health and Safety office must review research proposals involving the use of radioisotopes or other radioactive materials.

The Vice Provost for Research administers the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), which ensures fulfillment of the University’s legal and ethical responsibilities in regard to recombinant DNA. Sponsored Programs and Research is responsible for referring proposals to the IBC for review and follow-up before proposals are submitted to funding agencies. One proposal was referred and approved in 2000-2001. 

EQUITY AND SAFETY

Equity and safety are cornerstones of the university’s aspiration to become a premier learning community. The University is committed to an environment where learning and discovery can occur free from unlawful harassment and discrimination, and where equal opportunity is realized by all members of our community. We believe that fair and accurate reporting of crime is a hallmark of a campus committed to securing the safety of its community.

Equal Opportunity
The University reaffirmed its commitment to equal opportunity in December 1997, when the Board of Trustees adopted new equal opportunity and anti-harassment policies [EO1]. These policies are supported by an aggressive training and outreach effort spearheaded by the Office of Equity, Diversity, and Immigration Services (OEDIS).

The University is an affirmative action employer, and is committed to the broad application of federal and state laws governing equal opportunity. We place a special emphasis on training for hiring committees to insure that the broadest applicant pools possible are recruited. OEDIS monitors applicant flow during the recruitment process and prior to the extension of an offer of employment. OEDIS, working in conjunction with the university’s Equal Opportunity Committee, keeps our affirmative action plan current [AA10].

Unlawful Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policies
OEDIS is responsible for the enforcement of the university’s unlawful discrimination and anti-harassment policies. The Office brought more than 73 complaints to resolution from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2001.

OEDIS offers many training opportunities, workshops, lectures, and panel discussions in cooperation with a variety of internal and external constituencies. All faculty and staff are expected to participate in sexual harassment training. New graduate students are required to participate in sexual harassment prevention seminars conducted every August. New administrative and classified employees participate in a diversity awareness program and meet with representatives from OEDIS and the university’s General Counsel to learn how to handle complaints of unlawful discrimination and harassment.

Disability Services for Students
The Office of Disability Services provides equal educational access to students with disabilities. The Office accommodates over 400 students annually, assisting those with mobility challenges, learning disabilities, and mental and physical impairments. Among the Office’s many responsibilities are working with faculty to provide exam accommodations, helping students negotiate disability related barriers, and accommodating course substitution requests, to name just a few.

Safety on Campus
Preventing crime is critical to our goal of providing a safe and secure learning and working environment. Crime statistics are thoroughly and accurately reported in the University’s annual disclosures in compliance with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act [SS2].

Title IX Compliance in Intercollegiate Athletics
The University recently completed its second five-year equity plan for Intercollegiate Athletics. This task was conducted in conjunction with our NCAA Interim Certification Report. The University achieved many of the goals of our first plan, which was inaugurated in 1997. Achievements made under the 1997 plan include participation opportunities for women were increased with the addition of women’s soccer; additional resources were made available for recruitment, travel, and coaches salaries; and facilities and equipment for women’s sports were enhanced.

Like many colleges and universities across the country, we have struggled with our obligations under Title IX. In 1999, the University executed a settlement agreement with the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) agreeing to provide scholarships for female student athletes in a manner consistent with Title IX. In 2001, following two years of monitoring, OCR found the University in compliance with Title IX.

In March 2002, the University eliminated four men’s sports. Predicated on the need to free up resources to better support all sports and to stem the tide of an increasing budget deficit, the decision was made with an eye toward achieving greater balance between the percentage of women undergraduates and the percentage of women athletes. Preliminary indications show that this goal may be attained in 2002-03.

EFFORTS TO ENHANCE AND SUSTAIN DIVERSITY

The University is committed to enhancing the diversity of our community. Our official statement on diversity, approved by the Board of Trustees, makes this clear:

Bowling Green State University embraces, as an important educational value, the ideal of a diverse institution. The University fosters an environment which reflects and celebrates diversity, promotes tolerance and civility, encourages inclusion, embraces healthy interdependence, and promises to all members a learning community free of discrimination and harassment.

Our required curriculum includes coursework intended to engender an understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures. We recognize the need to have a variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds represented in our student body, faculty, and staff.

Student Diversity
The following is a summary of the most significant programs that are intended to enhance the diversity of the student body. These programs relate to recruitment and retention of minority, women, and international students.

Center for Multicultural and Academic Initiatives. This Center provides academic, personal, social, and cultural support to minority students. In order to empower and retain students, the Center’s staff enhances a campus environment where multiculturalism is understood and embraced [MA1]. The Center serves more than 500 students each year. The students supported by this office evaluate the quality of advising on a regular basis [EF1]. Among the programs supported by this office are the Freshman Development Program and the Pre-college Enrichment Program described below.

Freshman Development Program. The Freshman Development Program attempts to monitor the academic progress of first-year students. During individual advising sessions, the Program introduces students to academic issues such as degree requirements and academic policies. Students are also made aware of services available through such offices as the Registration and Records, Bursar, Financial Aid, Student Employment, Public Safety, Residence Life, and college advisors. Students are strongly encouraged to visit with their program advisors several times each semester during the freshman year. Once students have achieved 30 credit hours, they are encouraged to become self-reliant and to use the Center for Multicultural and Academic Initiatives as a campus resource. To insure that all Program participants are making successful academic progress, the advisor sends a mid-term report to each of their instructors. The advisor discusses the content of these reports with the students individually. An evaluation summary of Program advisors for fall 1999 is available in the resource room [EF1].

Pre-college Enrichment Program. The Pre-College Enrichment Program is a six-week summer program designed to provide highly motivated, minority, high school students with a well-rounded pre-college experience. The Program challenges the student’s academic skills and exposes the student to the intellectual rigors of college life. The Program’s curriculum includes career and personal development, interpersonal skills, mathematics, English, philosophy, biology, and computer science.

Since its inception in 1988, the Program has enhanced the academic and personal development of 344 African-American and Hispanic Ohio high school students. Of the 344 participants, 290 have graduated from high school, more than 95% have enrolled in a post secondary institution, and 107 have enrolled at the University.

Upward Bound. The University was awarded its first grant for Upward Bound in 1966. To be eligible, the students' parents must meet federal low-income guidelines and the students must be in the first generation in their families with the potential to graduate from college. Services offered to Upward Bound students include diagnostic testing, individual instruction and advising, and a summer residential and educational enrichment program. The program currently serves 75 high school students each year. The U.S. Department of Education provides funding for Upward Bound.

Multicultural Services Librarian. This faculty librarian brings to the attention of library staff and the campus community any minority, disability, and multicultural issues that relate to the libraries’ collections and services. Responsibilities include making contact with and serving on committees that play a role in multicultural diversity, adult learner, commuter, and disability services; and coordinating programs or services that may benefit these groups. This librarian also develops and coordinates the libraries’ outreach programs and services related to cultural diversity in which the university community participates.

Academic Investment in Math and Science (AIMS). This scholarship program identifies exceptionally capable underrepresented students who are high school seniors interested in pursuing a degree program in mathematics or science. Those who accept an invitation to join AIMS receive a stipend to attend a tuition-free, five-week, summer program before starting the freshman year at the University. Those who perform well during this session receive scholarships that are renewable up to four years.

During the four years of study, AIMS students participate in a weekly seminar that offers exploration of career paths in math and science, research opportunities, and opportunities to meet science professionals. Peer-learning and mentoring are also important components of this program.

In its first year (beginning summer 2001), twelve students matriculated into the AIMS program. All are pursuing a math or science major at the University. Eighteen new students enrolled in the program in summer 2002.

President’s Leadership Academy. The President’s Leadership Academy (PLA) is a four-year leadership development program for low-income students who, without the benefit of the associated scholarship, would not have an opportunity to attend a four-year institution of higher learning. The composition of the Academy is 55% students of color, many of whom are from the metropolitan Detroit area. During 2001-02, the Academy received three grants to recruit students from financially disadvantaged and underrepresented groups. The retention rate of students in the PLA is higher than the university’s average retention rate.

Student Exchange Programs. The University has established numerous exchange programs with accredited colleges and universities throughout the world. A complete list of the more than 40 exchange agreements entered into in recent years is found in the Resource Room [CE2]. In addition to allowing our students to continue their studies in another country, the programs allow us to host students from around the world. There were 30 international students on formal exchange programs at the University during calendar year 2000, and there were 45 during 2001.

Center for International Programs. The Center for International Programs coordinates the university’s recruiting efforts for international students, and has primary responsibility for retention of these students. The major recruitment efforts are department or program based; they rely on professional contacts in various disciplines and existing exchange programs. Increasingly, the Center advertises and recruits for international students online.

Retention of international students is a key function of the Center for International Programs; its immediate goal is not only to respond to students’ perceived needs but also to their anticipated needs. While the Program’s primary target is the socio-cultural and personal needs of students, they also remain cognizant of the role played by students’ academic needs.

The fall 2001 enrollment of 549 international students represents a 7.4% increase over the fall 2000 enrollment of 511. Additionally, the retention rate has continually been 95% or better for all enrolled international students during the past three years.

Faculty and Staff Diversity
The following policy applies to recruitment efforts for both faculty and staff.  

Faculty and Staff Diversity Recruitment and Retention Action Plan. We have developed a comprehensive plan for recruiting a diverse faculty and staff [DP1]. Activities undertaken in response to this plan include:

  • media campaigns (TV, radio, web, and print) targeting Ohio and regional metro markets;
  • a task force on diversity to assess programs and services, curriculum and development, and institutional climate;
  • recruiting documents distributed to each search committee [HP2];
  • representation at weekly job fairs at the Maurine Simmons Family Investment Center (in Toledo's central city);
  • maintaining regular contact with Children's Services Bureau 18 -21 year old clients, the Urban League Placement Center, and several community centers and churches; and
  • mandatory search committee training that addresses equal opportunity and diversity concerns in hiring.

Faculty Opportunity Program. The Office of the Provost has established the Faculty Opportunity Program to enhance the diversity of our faculty. The Program complements traditional recruitment efforts and broadens the university’s institutional investment in a diverse and outstanding faculty. The Program provides funds to enhance offers made to new faculty when all of the following criteria are met:

  • One or more strategic goals are identified as significant and central in allowing the University to reach its mission;
  • A candidate is identified with unique characteristics that can be related to fostering those goals;
  • The specific opportunity was not anticipated when searches were authorized;

Assessment of Diversity Initiatives
The University has instituted numerous programs to enhance diversity among our students and faculty, and these are having an effect, although modest [DS2]. Our student body and our faculty are becoming more diverse. Increasing the diversity of administrative and classified staff remains a challenge. We are also doing a better job of retaining women and minorities. Retention is approaching equality within the student body as a whole [DS2].

SUMMARY

The self-study process found clearly articulated policies and procedures governing university functions, including communications with internal and external constituencies; research conduct and oversight; equitable treatment of diverse constituencies; maintenance of a safe environment; and efforts to enhance diversity. Procedures and policies are known to the appropriate constituencies; are readily available in print and electronic media; and receive appropriate levels of use.

The self-study revealed only two areas of concern relative to the integrity with which the University conducts its business, and both are minor. There is an absence of a centralized system or resource for tracking and monitoring affiliation agreements. Second, no single office is responsible for coordinating exchange programs or for assuring consistency in the approval process for such programs. The appropriate office has already responded to this discovery and is developing guidelines and policies to address the need. In all other areas, the self-study process revealed a high level of functioning in the integrity with which the University pursues its purposes

Next Page