1. Institution of a systematic, campus-wide plan for replacing obsolete/obsolescent classroom technology equipment.
2. Allows for the expansion of technology ³master classrooms² across campus to meet scheduling demands of students and faculty
members.
3. Provides standardized technology equipment throughout campus that facilitates maintenance, repair, and faculty familiarity
with equipment and controls.
4. Provides a small pool of technology equipment for emergency replacement and for delivery to those rooms without permanently
installed equipment.
The demand for instructional rooms with technology display capabilities at BGSU by faculty presently exceeds the number of
such rooms in the classroom pool. This shortage has become more marked in the last few years and is expected to become more
acute as the demand for computer display and video streaming capabilities increases rapidly among BGSU's faculty and students.
Not implementing this plan would cause the 91 classrooms that are currently equipped with technology to rapidly become obsolete.
At present, some of these rooms have projectors that were installed in 1994 that are unable to handle present software. Other
older projectors lack the brightness to be easily seen. The passage of time will only exacerbate this situation. Few classrooms
have computers permanently installed and the pool of portable computers for delivery is aging, unreliable, and not available
in sufficient numbers to approach a demand that continues to increase. Without the standardization that this plan facilitates,
classrooms will continue to have individual quirks that require faculty technology training that is room specific. Additionally,
the number of equipped classrooms will fall far below the needs of BGSU faculty and students.
Partial support of the plan would necessitate a decision to either: a) install equipment in new master classrooms while allowing
existing rooms to become obsolete; or, b) replace equipment in existing master classrooms causing the pool of technology equipped
rooms to fall further behind the faculty/student demand with the passage of time; or c) to “go slow” on both classroom technology
upgrades and installations causing the negative implications of both a) and b) with a few rooms being added and improved.
This plan was submitted on February 20, 2003 by the members of the CTWG: Dr. Kevin Work, Director, Instructional Media Services;
Anthony Short, Director, Learning Services, WBGU-TV; Robert Waddle Assistant Vice President, Capital Planning; Laura Waggoner,
Director, Registration and Scheduling; Dale Schroeder, Budget Analyst, Office of the CIO; Cheryl Joyce, Coordinator, Learning
Services, WBGU-TV; Julie Baker, Manager/Classroom Technology, Instructional Media Services; David Steen, Audio-Visual Technology
Specialist, Instructional Media Services; and Brian Rellinger, Desktop Support Coordinator, ITS.