Group 12
Julie Doan
Laurie Evans
Julianna Frushour
Martin Foster
Nicole Demith


Please CLICK one of the following to read more about it:
Private Censorship (Julie Doan)
Cable vs. Broadcast Censorship (Julianna Frushour, Laurie Evans)
International Censorship (Martin Foster)
Social Implications and Public Morality on Censorship
 (Nicole Demith)
Sources


Julie Doan
Private Censorship
    Censorship can be defined as the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are “offensive” to a persons personal Political or moral views.  Censorship can be carried out by the government as well as private groups.  The private groups can boycott against stores or TV programs that can provide images, language, or ideas that they disapprove of, which are protected by the First Amendment.  The First Amendment is based on that in a free society, individuals are free to decide for themselves what to read, write, see, and hear.  So if there is something on TV that they disapprove of they have every right to turn it off and not listen to or watch it.
      The government cannot censor everything that every single person in the country disapproves of, so that is why it is left up to the parents to decide what their children can watch and what they can’t watch.  Many believe that exposure to images of violence causes people to act in destructive ways, which may lead parents to want to censor their children from violent TV shows.  But it is also said that parents have gotten lazy in the past years exercising their right to censor their children’s eye and ears.  With modern technology today, parents can use devices that make it possible to block specific TV programs.  Researcher’s from the “parents opt out of censorship” article states that 2 in 5 parents use the technology that is available to block unwanted programs.  Another way parents would know if a program is suitable for their child, is that the Motion Picture Association of American (MPAA) rates motion Pictures.  With “G” rating being suitable for all audiences up to “R” , “X”, and NC17 which are considered appropriate for adults.  Under the First Amendment adults have the right to speak their own mind on what they think is appropriate and what not, they also have the right to censor their children’s eyes and ears from any television show that is unsuitable for them.
Back to Top

Laurie Evans
Cable Television
    On an average day have you ever found yourself channel surfing while relaxing on your trusty old sofa? Also, have you ever seen a difference between network and cable television? If you have then you have made a correct assumption. The difference between the content displayed on either of these networks is absolutely astounding. A typical person could see an edited version of a show on one network and on another view the same show with content that was edited out of the first version. The main reason behind this phenomenon deals with censorship in the media. This country has set up two types of television one for example, is prime time television. Prime time television is a service provided for everyone and contains the basic channels such as NBC, CBS, and ABC. The other service deals with the cable network which is provided by either a cable or satellite provider. Due to the separation between theses two sections there is also separation in the rules governing over these stations. The group in charge of controlling what goes on air is called the FCC.
    The FCC stands for the Federal Communication Commission. Unlike prime time television cable television is not under direct control of the FCC. Cable TV is able to broadcast a variety of content, ranging from explicit language to violent car chases. On the flip side, prime time television is under a great deal of scrutiny by the FCC, if found in offense the station could be faced with thousand dollar fines.
    The great aspect of cable television comes from its ability to broadcast what society calls "risky" content. This content ranges from strong sexual content to strong violent scenes, but not all channels on this network carry risky material. Cable television carries channels like HBO, STARZ, and TBS and the content includes family material and adult dramas. The issues of censorship arose from parents concerns about children being able to view material that is unfit for their age and extremely violent. Unfortunately, because of the FCC’s loose grip on the censorship of cable television there was little that parents could do about what the stations showed. Therefore, authorities had to research other idea, along with this research came the ideas of the rating system, V-chip, and the TV Guardian.
    The rating system was part of the 1996 Telecommunication Law. This law stated that a panel consisting of parents, television programming producers, and cable operators etc. to determine television shows rating standards.  This team of members evaluates shows that wish to be broadcast on air and gives them a rating as follows:
TV-Y (All children)
TV-Y7 (Directed to Older Children)
TV-G (General Audience)
TV-PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
TV-14(Parental Guidance Suggested)
TV-MA (Mature Audience Only)
    The law states that if this panels fails at its mission their responsibility will be turned over to the Federal Communication Commission. This rating was created to assist parents in deciding whether or not the programming is appropriate for their children.
    The V-Chip is an electronic chip which works in tune with your cable box, or VCR. This chip is an additional way of controlling what is seen by ones children. This chip reads transmitted rating codes for all programming that reaches ones television set and will automatically deny access to all programming if it is not within your settings. It also works as an on and off switch and needs the rating system to function correctly, if the program rating exceeds the set ratings, then the v-chip blocks the whole program.
    The opposite of the v-chip is the TVGuardian. This system begins working where the v-chip stops. Instead of blocking the entire television show, the system instead edits out offensive language. Also, this guardian works along with your VCR or DVD player.


Julianna Frushour
Public Censorship

    The censorship of broadcast television is centered around the values and norms of the “nuclear” family.  In the 50’s and 60’s the programs were structured for white, middle-class Americans.  The broadcasters would format their shows around what they thought their viewing audience wanted to see.  However, in the 70’s rating researchers began to separate the programs into different demographics; for instance, age, ethnicity, education and economic background.  In the 80’s, television began to include explicit sexual and violent programming in order to compete with the wide range of shows cable television brought to to the audience.  Networks began to allow partial nudity, graphic violence and coarse language.  By doing this they made themselves vulnerable to conservative advocacy groups who increased the pressure for regulation by the government. 
    One of the ways we can see censorship on what we watch now is the Television Rating System.  In 1996, the television industry came up with a rating system to give parents more information about what could potentially be on television when their children are watching.  They began to use an age based system, separating all television programs into six different categories:  TV-Y, TV-Y7, TV-G, TV-PG, TV-14 and TV-M.  From there they included more information about the program by using “V” for Violence, “N” for nudity, and so on.
    While TV Ratings have become a controversy because of their ability to limit free speech (Ines, 1999), our government supports them because some shows will have a bigger impact than most, and people are already becoming disgusted by the content of those.
Back to Top


Martin Foster
International Censorship
    Regulations and restrictions on television broadcasts vary from from country to country.  Each world region has differing values and norms, concerning what they feel constitutes decent or appropriate material o be viewed.  Some countries have more stringent restrictions than those of the United States.  Others are more lax or are equally hindering.  In Australia, for example, the regulatory system is quite similar to our own in America.  On the internet web site Brainy Encyclopedia, Australia's restrictions are discussed, “Currently Australia’s censorship regime is largely the purview of the Office of Film and Literature Classification... The classification system for visual content is largely standardized for television, videos and features.”  Each television show is rated at one of six classifications:  G(general viewing), PG(15 and under, parent permission required), M(15 and over, parents cautioned) MA(15 and over), R(18 and over) and X(also 18 and over).  This is similar to our television ratings that appear in the little black boxes in the top left corner of the televisions in America, (www.brainyencyclopedia.com).  Other countries are not as relaxed and do not permit one to regulate oneself at all as far as what one can watch on television.  On their web site, the Congressional-Executive Commission on Censorship states “The Chinese government restricts who can legally receive satellite television broadcasts and restricts individual ownership of satellite receivers,” (www.cecc.gov).  In this case, the government has total control over what their country views and allows the people no control or self-regulations.
Back to Top


Nicole Demith
Social Implications and Public Morality on Censorship
    In the article written by James Brown called Family Viewing Time, it explains that  “The United States Congress exhorted the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) to take action regarding the perennial issues of alleged excesses of sex, crime, and violence in broadcast programming.” The FCC is responsible for what is allowed to be shown and what time certain things can be broadcasted on television. The United States constitution grants us the right of freedom of expression, which has ultimately led to the desensitization of our community. The control of the FCC in the media raises the question of what freedom of expression and speech truly means.  When you start to censor the ractice of a constitutional right it takes away the freedom to that right.
    The United States has went from watching the Brady Bunch (where a married couple would sleep in separate beds) to television shows like Will and Grace (where viewers see homosexuality with a homosexual man married to a straight woman because of tax benefits, not to mention they sleep in THE SAME BED). Because of censorship morals are not the same as they once were years before. Children are exposed to much more in this era because of what is shown on television. For example, during the time of the Civil War, there was no television, so the country was very patriotic. Now there is media coverage with crossfire in the background, and videos that show prisoners of war being tortured and some even being decapitated, which shows that nothing is off limits. But people like Michael Moore show that graphic events seen in the media might be a serious cause for the tragedy at Columbine High School. Yet knowing this the FCC would rather censor sexually explicit television over graphic television. That is unless it’s “News” of course.
    The morality and lawsuits towards broadcasting stations seems to be the control of the FCC. The events that happened during the half-time show during the Super Bowl of 2004, involving the singer Janet Jackson and her breast led to numerous complaints and the eventual installment of the five second delay in live television. For some reason Janet’s breast was considered too much for television, yet the deaths of thousands when the towers fell was alright to show for entire day on September 11, 2001. Children today are so trained to seeing movies and television shows that involve violence that when “the terrorist attack” occurred, teacher  Wendy Demith of Tiffin Elementary heard her students say, “cool.” Instead of truly realizing the event that had occurred. Society demands for so much action and violence in the media to the point where things like death are viewed as entertainment instead of tragedy.
    Why does society in the United States feel it necessary that sex in the media is unacceptable yet carnage is demanded to be viewed?  In the article, “What do guys want,” by James Poniewozik, in Time magazine vol. 163, it states that “guys want danger and authenticity-- the raw, unbleeped real deal, unpredictable without a five second delay… The
networks are caught between irresistible force and an implacable object.” Almost everything censored by the FCC is in reality demanded by society. The social implications in media is violence, is sex and is drugs. Everything in which the FCC tries to control and take away from our constitutional right to freedom of expression and to freedom speech.
Back to Top


Brainy Encyclodedia.  Description of Australian censorship.  Retrieved on 10/8/2004, from
http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/c/ce/censorship_in_australia.html#Current%20situation

Congressional-Executive Commission on Censorship: Virtual Academy. Blocking, Filtering and Monitoring.
Retrieved on 10/8/2004, from http://www.cecc.gov/pages/virtualAcad/exp/expjamming.php

Ines, Ana.  (1999).  Is a Rating System Censorship:  It's a Way to Live Together.  Retrieved 10/13/2004, from
        http://www.topics-mag.com/edition12/media-ratings.htm

Marin, Rick, et al. Censorship. (1994). Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved 10/ 7/2004, from
http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/C/htmlC/Censorship/censorship.htm

Parents Opt out of censorship. (2000, June 26). BBC news. Retrieved 10/ 7/2004, from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/806837.stm

Potter, D. (2004). Indecent Oversight. American Journalism Review, 26(4), 80.

Robson, S. (2004). You Can't Do That on Television! New York Times, 153(52914), 1.

Thierer, Adam. Censoring Violence in Media. (2004, August 10). TechKnowledge. Retrieved 10/7/2004, from
http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/040810-tk.html.
Wormingham and Buxton.  (11/15/2004).  Censorship:  The Museum of Broadcast Communications.  The start of censorship.
        Retrieved 10/11/2004, from http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/index.html
Back to Top