Spacer
Spacer
BGSU


HomeAcademicsAdmissionsThe ArtsAthleticsLibrariesOffices
Spacer
Spacer Spacer
Top Nav   COMPLEX COGNITION LABORATORY
Cross Hatch
No Banner
Spacer
 
Spacer
 
Researchers in the Complex Cognition Laboratory pursue questions relating to how inference, judgment, and memory processes interact with, and sometimes adapt to the informational environment. Thus, the work can be construed as an ecological approach to the study of cognition. Some, though not all of the current work deals with a particular kind of environmental context--the mathematical environment--that can potentially constrain and guide all kinds of cognition.

Students in the lab need not have an extensive background in math per se (though such an orientation is a definite plus). Rather, students need to be highly logical, well-motivated, and curious about potential applications of broad ecological and evolutionary concepts to the study of cognition (also see general advice for graduate students).

Current projects include intuitive correlation detection, illusory correlation (seeing correlations that aren't there), social simulation, and the mathematical bases for the cognitive exaggeration of group differences.

Faculty

Graduate Students
  • Leisha Colyn <leishaw@bgsu.edu>
  • Justin Gilkey <jgilkey@bgsu.edu>
  • Beth Hartzler <hbeth@bgsu.edu>
  • Andrew McCracken <amccrac@bgsu.edu>
  • Neil Berg
  • Advice for Graduate Students
Undergraduate Students
  • Jenn Diveto <jdiveto@bgsu.edu>
  • Billyanne Hall <bmhall@bgsu.edu>

Current Work

Note: The following conference presentations and articles (pre-publication versions) are downloadable via [THIS LINK].

(h) Anderson, R. B., Doherty, M. E., & Friedrich, J. (in press). Sample size and correlational inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.

(g) Doherty, M. E., Anderson, R. B., Angott, A. M., & Klopfer, D. S. (2007). The perception of scatterplots. Perception & Psychophysics.

(f) Anderson, R. B., & Doherty, M. E. (2007). Sample size and the detection of means: A signal detection account. Memory & Cognition, 69, 1261-1272.

(e) Gilkey, J. M., Anderson, R. B., & Doherty, M. E. (2006). The effects of sample size on different measures of subjective correlation. Poster presented at the Annual meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making.

(d) Kelley, A. M., Anderson, R. B., & Doherty, M. E.  (2006).  Effects of correlational strength and correlational indeterminacy on judgments of causality. Poster session presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making's 27th Conference, Houston, TX.

(c) Anderson, R. B., Doherty, M. E., & Friedrich, J. (2005). Statistical/ecological factors in the effects of sample size on correlational inference. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.

(b) Anderson, R. B., Doherty, M. E., Berg, N. D., & Friedrich, J. C. (2005). Sample size and the detection of correlation—A signal detection account: Comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005). Psychological Review, 112, 268-279.

(a) Anderson, R. B. (2001). The power law as an emergent property. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1061-1068.


Current Funding - National Science Foundation Grant #0423825



 
Spacer
Spacer Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer