Rhetoric and Composition Ph.D. Program Bowling Green State University

Rhetoric and Composition Home

Writing Across the Curriculum

R&W Program and Course Descriptions

Admissions Requirements

Apply Online

Visual Tour

Faculty

E-Portfolio

Candidacy Checklist

Preliminary Readings

R&W Program Newsletter

Links to Journals

English Links

BGSU English Home Page

BGSU Home

Computers and Composition Online

Rhetoric & Writing Position

 

Some Highlights About

The Preliminary Examination Process

The preliminary-examination process for the Rhetoric & Writing PhD Program has three parts: a written General Examination based on a required reading list, a Specialized Portfolio Examination, and an Oral Examination taken after successful completion of the first two components.  This sheet highlights some information explained in more detail in the Rhetoric & Writing PhD Program Handbook.

General Preliminary Examination   This is a written examination prepared by your Committee and based on the General Exam Reading List.  Typically, you will write on three or four questions (selected from a number of options) in the course of a weekend (Friday AM to Monday AM).  (The General Preliminary Examination reading list was recently updated so students entering the Rhetoric & Writing PhD Program before January 2005 may work from the old list--perhaps making some updates in consultation with their committees--if they have already begun study for Prelims.)

Specialized Portfolio Examination   The specialized element of the Preliminary Examination for Rhetoric & Writing PhD students is a portfolio developed by the student and evaluated by the student’s Committee.  The Specialized Portfolio consists of these four sections:

A. Professional Revising Project.  This section will include (1) the original of a R&W Program seminar paper; (2) a revision of that paper intended for conference delivery or for submission to a journal or book editor, and (3) an Afterword that discusses and illustrates the nature of the revision--and the reasons for changes during revision.

B. Professional Curriculum Project.  This section will include the syllabus for a writing course (either taught or anticipated) and a compact but specific Afterword that discusses (in light of General Prelim List readings and other sources) the principles that ground and shape the syllabus.

C. Initial Dissertation Reading List. With an eye toward future dissertation research, the student will work with the Committee Chair to develop an Initial Reading List or 30-40 works, not duplicating any works on the General Prelim List. 

D. Bibliographic Essay.  Working with the Initial Reading List, the student will develop a bibliographic essay showing understanding of individual works, key relationships and differences among works, and important issues, questions, and needed research in the area of the future dissertation.

The Specialized Portfolio may be developed on paper or in a web environment.  It will be developed by the student in close consultation with the Committee Chair.  The Specialized Portfolio will be evaluated individually by the members of the Committee, and during the Orals component of the Preliminary Examination.  The date for submitting the complete Portfolio will be decided on by the Committee in relation to the scheduling of Orals, which should take place within three weeks of the General Examination.

Implementation Date:  This Specialized Portfolio Examination is required of all students who begin the Rhetoric & Writing PhD program after May 2005.  Students already in the Program may, at their option, take a Specialized Portfolio Examination in lieu of a second written examination if they are in the early stages of preparation for Prelims and if the R&W members of their committees approve the requests.


Prelim Exam & Dissertation Committees

Before the end of the second year of course work, you should start planning toward Preliminary Examinations and deciding which member of the Core Rhetoric & Writing Faculty you want as your Prelim and Dissertation committee chair.  Typically, one Core R&W Faculty member chairs both prelim and dissertation committees.  In selecting a chair, you should consult with the Program Advisor and, after that, with the faculty member you are considering.  Core Rhetoric & Writing PhD Program faculty members must make up a majority of the committee.  So your committee should look like this:

1. A Core Rhetoric & Writing Program Faculty member serving as Chair;

2. A second Core Rhetoric & Writing Faculty member;

3. Either a third Core Rhetoric & Writing Faculty member OR another English Department graduate faculty member with special expertise and connection to the student’s specialization;

4. One "outside" faculty member appointed by the Graduate College.

A Few Important Details and Dates to Keep In Mind

The Rhetoric & Writing PhD Program Handbook includes a great deal of information about the Preliminary Exam process--and many other things as well.  This list just highlights a few important details.

1. You need to complete a Tentative Degree Program (TDP) report for the Graduate College before establishing a Preliminary Exam Committee.

2. You must complete the Language requirement before you can schedule your Exams.

3.  Between the completion of course work and the completion of the preliminary Examinations, the appropriate form of graduate registration is ENG 798 (independent study in preparation for prelims--graded S/U).  Because credit for this course is only allotted in 3 credit hour blocks, you may need to register for 798s with three or four different members of your committee.

4. A month or more before the General Exam, you will schedule a Committee meeting to discuss the nature and shape of the General Exam.  Another and much earlier Committee meeting may be useful for discussing your plans for the Specialized Portfolio Examination.

5. The Oral Exam needs to be held within three weeks of the time you write the General Exam.

6. The previous point will influence when you submit your Specialized Portfolio Examination to the Committee.  You should work closely with your Chair about this in order to assure that Committee members have ample time to read and evaluate your Portfolio.

December, 2005