English 615: Modern English Linguistics
summer, 2009
Vegetable Languages
Problem One: Rosebush Segment Inventory
p [voiceless bilabial stop]
b [voiced bilabial stop]
m [bilabial nasal]
t [voiceless alveolar stop]
d [voiced alveolar stop]
n [alveolar nasal]
k [voiceless velar stop]
g [voiced velar stop]
N [alveolar nasal]
i [high front tense]
I [high front lax]
e [mid front tense]
u [high back tense]
U [high back lax]
o [mid back tense]
1. What is unusual about the Rosebush segment inventory?
- With ohnly 9 consonants, it is extremely small.
- It lacks fricatives.
- There is no /a/ phoneme.
2. If 'Rosebush' is, in fact, the name of the language, how would speakers of this language pronounce that given their segment inventory and assuming their maximum syllable is CV?
- The only consonant in the word [rozbUS] in the consonant segment inventory is [b], so we must find phonetically similar substitutes for [r] [z] and [S].
for [r] and [z], a nearby voiced segment would be a good choice: perhaps [d]. for [S], [t] might be a good choice since it is nearby and voiceless. This would give us [dodbUt]. Now, the syllable structure is a concern: with CV syllables, consonannts and vowels must alternate in a CVCVCV pattern and the word cannot end with a consonant. To achieve this, we can either delete some consonants or insert some vowels. Which of these we do is up to us.
[dodbUt] could become [dobUto]
- 3. How would your answer above change if the maximum syllable were CVC?
this would make all the above deleting and inserting unnecessary. We could simply have [dodbUt]
- Here are two phonological rules for Rosebush. Given these rules and a maximum syllable of CVC, which of the following words are permissible and which violate the phonological constraints of Rosebush? Where a word is in violation, please correct it.
Rule 1: .t/ and .s/ are in complementary distribution. they are allophones of the same phoneme. [t] occurs word initial and .s/ occurs Elsewhere.
Rule 2. [dz] occurs word finally and [d] occurs elsewhere.
- [steb] stem
First off, we can't begin with CC. So, we must delete a C or
insert a vowel between the two consonants.
With this sequence, le'ts delete the [s]. this gives us [teb]. since [t] occurs word initially, [teb] is a legal word and we can be finished. Incidentally, if we had deleted [t] instead and left [seb], the rules would have changed that [s] into a [t] anyway.
- [bUd] bud
[d] and dz] are allophones of the same phoneme with [dz] occurring word finally. thus, this word must become [bUdz] to be a legal word.
- [dzudud] rich earth
[dz] occurs only word finally and d elsewhere. tis word must be changed to [dududz].
- [gopis] leaf killing disease
[t] and [s] are allphones of the same phoneme with [t] word initial and [s] elsewhere. Thus, this word-final [s] is fine.
- [zo] bright red
there is no [z] in the Rosebush segment inventory. the closest possible segment, the one most phonetically similar is [d] which shares place or articulation and voicing with [z]. This word might be [do]. since [d] is word initial, [do] is a legal word.
- [bINk] big
[bINk] is a CVCC word and thus not allowed in a CVC language.
[bIN] would be fine as would [bIk] or even [bINik]
- [todz] toad
the [t] is word initial and the [dz] word final. this one is fine as is.
- [ntIski] light breeze
This word would be fine except that that [t] is not word initial. [t] appears as [s] if it is not word initial. thus, the legal word is [nsIski].
It's not a legal word in English, but it is in Rosebush).
- [zoda] cardinal
[z] is not a segment in this language. We change it to [d] and get [doda]. [doda] is fine.
- [eka] squirrel
also fine.
- [tUkda] goose
also fine.
- [tes] family group of worms
fine.
Back to step 5 help