i [high front tense]
I [high front lax]
e [mid front tense]
u [high back tense]
U [high back lax]
o [mid back tense]
Here are two phonological rules for Rosebush.
Rule 1: .t/ and .s/ are in complementary distribution. they are allophones of the same phoneme. [t] occurs word initial and .s/ occurs Elsewhere.
Rule 2. [dz] occurs word finally and [d] occurs elsewhere.
Talk through of making the rules for problem one NB: the talk-through does not answer the questions below; it only covers the making of the rules.
1. What is unusual about the Rosebush segment inventory?
2.If speakers of this language tried to say the English word 'rosebush',
how would they pronounce that given their segment inventory and assuming their maximum syllable is CV?
3. How would your answer above change if the maximum syllable were CVC?
Given the rules above and a maximum syllable of CVC, which of the following words are permissible and which violate the phonological constraints of Rosebush? Where a word is in violation, please correct it.
i [high front tense]
e [mid front tense]
{ [low front lax]
u [high back tense]
o [mid back tense]
a [low back lax]
Rule 1: [p] and [t] are in complementary distribution. [t] occurs before [i] and [u]. [p] occurs elsewhere.
Rule 2: [W] (voicelless labio-velar glide} occurs after voiceless consonants. [w] occurs elsewhere.
Talk through of making the rules for problem two
Here is a list of veNuf faikw{p words written in phonemic rather than phonetic transcription. Replace the /w/ and /p/ phonemes with their proper allophones.