|
Portfolio
Guidelines
|
|
General Guidelines:
Keep in mind that this portfolio will help you on the job market as well as in working with our program assessment goals. So, in addition to including a few examples of work that meet the goals listed below, you may want to also include some personal and professional touches of your own:
Goals-Based Assesment for Rhetoric and Writing (Spring 2003):
|
General English Department Learning Outcomes: |
Examples
|
| 1. Students effectively
use writing--including current modes and evolving techniques and technologies--to explore subject matter and to communicate. |
E.g.: Sem papers, Conf papers, web portfolios |
| 2. Students develop
understanding of subject matter in relation to larger historical and/or cultural contexts. |
E.g.: Seminar work, Prelims, Dissertation |
| 3. Students make connections
between theory and practice. (Students apply theory to understand texts,
solve problems, teach effectively, and/or students generalize from experiences with texts, communication situations, teaching . . . .) |
E.g.: Seminar work, Prelims, Dissertation |
| 4. Students develop skills of critical and/or creative thinking | E.g.: Seminar work, Prelims, Dissertation |
|
Rhetoric
& Writing PhD Program Planning Goals:
|
Some
Areas Where the Goals Are Addressed Most Explicitly
|
|
Planning Goals of
the
|
620, 780 Adv Pedagogy, 728.602, GSW mentoring. Internships
|
| 2. Graduates
are prepared theoretically and practically to work in computer environments in their professional and scholarly lives. |
|
|
3. Graduates are familiar
with research in a
|
|
|
4. Graduates understand and can discuss major competing theories and contested issueswithinrhetoric and composition.
|
|
| 5. Graduates
understand and can discuss the rhetorical tradition and significant disciplinary texts and authors/theorists that shape the field of composition. |
|
| 6 Graduates understand the impact of rhetorical history on contemporary rhetorical theory and composition practice. |
|
| 7. Graduates
are oriented to the place of scholarship in faculty work and rewards,and
they have begun to work in professional contexts by developing ideas for submission to editors and conference chairs and by giving conference papers. |
|