 |
Arts & Sciences
home > Handbook
Contents > Section 2
Contents > Section 2.4
Section 2.4
PROMOTION AND TENURE REVIEW COMMITTEE (PTRC)
Membership
1. Divisional Representation
- Three members, elected by the probationary and
tenured faculty, one elected from each of the three divisions of
the college. These members will serve two-year terms.
- An at-large member elected by the probationary and tenured
faculty of the college to serve a two-year term. Candidates
for this position will rotate among the three divisions.
2. The chair of the PTRC rotates annually among the three
divisions.
3. To allow for 'staggered' terms, the at-large member is elected
along with one divisional representative. Alternate years, two
divisional members are elected.
4. To elect a divisional member to the PTRC, each department of
the division elects one nominee; all faculty in a division vote on
all nominees. Probationary and tenured faculty, including
chairs, are eligible to vote. The following restrictions
apply:
- No probationary faculty, department chairs,
assistant/associate deans, or administrators are eligible to stand
for election as a representative to the PTRC. Faculty
members whose primary faculty assignment is outside the College of
Arts and Sciences are also ineligible for PTRC membership.
- Members must be elected by a majority of those voting rather
than by a plurality.
- No individual may serve two successive terms.
- No division may elect two successive representatives from the
same department.
- The PTRC may not have two members from the same department (or
comparable unit).
Function
1. Promotion/Tenure Review:
- The PTRC membership reviews the documentation for all
candidates being reviewed for promotion or tenure except those
from their respective departments. The Committee does review
dossiers of faculty NOT recommended for tenure at the department
level (Charter interpretation, 1989).
- Recommendations from the PTRC to the Dean are of three
types: recommended for promotion and/or tenure; not
recommended for promotion and/or tenure; and no recommendation
(split). Such recommendations may be shared formally or
informally. The PTRC does not "vote" as an official step in the
college's tenure/promotion process.
2. Annual Review of Tenure-Track Faculty
These reviews provide peer feedback in reference to performance
standards established in the unit's tenure/promotion and merit
documents and should focus on progress. It is important to document
the strengths and weaknesses of the probationer to provide important
developmental feedback in a regularized fashion.
- For faculty hired in 1997 and later, multiple year
contracts determine the year for review and recommendation for
reappointment. In general, the faculty member will be reviewed
during the third year (3/7) before a decision is made to reappoint
for an additional three years. Materials submitted for review are
the same as for tenure/promotion with the exception of the
external letters of evaluation. If a person is awarded credit for
previous full-time university experience, the mid-career review
will take place during the final year of their first multiple year
contract. The PTRC will review the files submitted and assess the
progress being made.
- For faculty hired prior to 1997, annual review for
reappointment is still necessary. Tenured faculty members are
responsible for participating in this important process. An Annual
Progress Toward Tenure Policy is standard for the college and
describes the procedure to be followed. Specifically, the
credentials (vita and letter of evaluation from the chair/director
written in conjunction with a sub-group of tenured faculty) are
submitted to the PTRC and reviewed during year four.
The last changes in this document were recommended by A & S Council
and approved by the tenured and probationary faculty of the College
on April 4, 2002.
|